心理学
JournalofBusinessResearch63(2010)673 681
ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
JournalofBusinessResearch
Adaptingtoaretailenvironment:Modelingconsumer–environmentinteractions
FrancescoMassaraa, ,SandraS.Liub,RobertD.Melarac
abc
IULMUniversity,Italy
PurdueUniversity,UnitedStates
CityCollege,CityUniversityofNewYork,UnitedStates
articleinfoabstract
Thispaperextendscurrentthinkingontherelationshipbetweenconsumersandtheretailenvironmentbyassessingatheoryofconsumer–environmentinteractionthatreinterpretsarousalanddominance,twodimensionsofthePADmodel(Mehrabian,Albert,Russel,JamesA.,Anapproachtoenvironmentalpsychology.Cambridge,MA:MITPress,1974.),asappraisaldimensions(affectiveexpectations).Accordingtothenewaccount,themorespeci cthetask,thelesstolerantconsumersareaboutdiscrepanciesbetweenexpectedandexperiencedarousalanddominance.Thestudyevaluatedtheeffectsofmatchingormismatchingappraisalsonjudgmentsofemotionaldimensionsasparticipantsshoppedwithinavirtualstoreenvironment.Appraisalsweremanipulatedbycombiningtwogoalconditions(goalspeci cityvs.goalambiguity)withtwolevelsofstorearousal(highvs.low)toproducefourseparatehypotheticalstates:hedonic t(ambiguousgoalandhigharousal),utilitarian t(speci cgoalandlowarousal),rationalcontrol(ambiguousgoalandlowarousal),andemotionalsubmissiveness(speci cgoalandhigharousal).Whenperceptualandcognitiveappraisalsmatched(i.e.,hedonicorutilitarian t),participantsjudgedpleasuretobesigni cantlygreaterthanwhenexpectationsmismatched(i.e.,rationalcontroloremotionalsubmissiveness).Affectiveexpectationsconcerningarousalanddominancethusareastrongdeterminantofconsumerpredispositiontowardtheenvironment.
©2009ElsevierInc.Allrightsreserved.
Articlehistory:
Received1April2008
Receivedinrevisedform1February2009Accepted1May2009Keywords:
StoreatmospherePAD
Cognitiveappraisals
EnvironmentaladaptationShoppinggoalsIn-storeexperience
Consumerdecision-makingstudiesfocusonproductchoice,agoods-centeredviewofmarketing(VargoandLusch,2004).Theliteraturere ectsagrowinginterestinincorporatingatmosphericsandtheeffectsofthestoreenvironmentintoconsumerdecision-makingmodels(Erogluetal.,2005;InmanandWiner,1998;KaltchevaandWeitz,2006).Environmentalpsychologyhasaidedthestudyofatmosphericeffectsbydevelopingataxonomyofstimuliforstoreandserviceenvironments(Bakeretal.,2002;TurleyandMilliman,2000).Thepleasure-arousal-dominance(PAD)modelofemotions(DonovanandRossiter,1982;MehrabianandRussel,1974),thatbuildsfromenvironmentalpsychologyandtheS-O-Rframework(Spangenbergetal.,1996;TurleyandMilliman,2000),dominatestheliteratureonstoreatmospherics.Themodelpositsthataconsumer'semotionalresponsestoproductsandservicescanbedecomposedalongthreeindependentdimensions:pleasure–displeasure,arousal–nonarousal,anddominance–submissiveness.
SeveralinherentlimitationsofthePADmodelrestrictitspracticalvalueinpredictingshoppingbehavior.First,thePADliteraturepaysscantempiricalattentiontoexternalvalidityormoderatorvariables(e.g.,shoppingorientation)inassessingemotionalreactionstostoreatmo-spherics,leadingtoinconsistentand,attimes,contradictory ndings(KaltchevaandWeitz,2006;Massara,2003).Second,PADdiscountsthe
Correspondingauthor.IULMUniversity,DepartmentofEconomicsandMarketing,8,ViaCarloBò,Room2210,20143Milano,Italy.
E-mailaddress:francesco.massara@iulm.it(F.

Massara).0148-2963/$–seefrontmatter©2009ElsevierInc.Allrightsreserved.doi:

10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.004
in uenceoftheconsumerontheenvironment(Massara,2003;Ng,2003).Third,thePADliteraturefrequentlyignoresthefunctionalrelationshipsamongenvironmentalvariables(Babinetal.,2003;Chebatetal.,2001;Erogluetal.,2005;Michonetal.,2005).Fourth,fewbehavioralstudiesrelatedirectlytoemotions,leavingmuchoftheknowledgeofconsumeremotionalreactionswithoutsubstantiveapplication(Erogluetal.,2005;TurleyandMilliman,2000).Finally,PADdoesnotdistinguishamongemotionalstates(e.g.,joy,hope,anger,orfear),limitingtheanalysistothevalenceofemotions(LernerandKeltner,2000).
Toaddresstheselimitations,thisstudyproposesareinterpretationofthePADmodelthatmakesexplicitreferencetotheappraisalframework.Theapproachblendstwostagesinthedevelopmentoftheconsumer–environmentrelationship.The rstisbasedontheemotion–cognitiontraditionespousedbythePADmodel(DonovanandRossiter,1982;HavlenaandHolbrook,1986).Researcheffortsinthistraditionaimatunderstandingtheatmosphericfactorsthattriggerapproachbehavior(DonovanandRossiter,1982;Kotler,1973),withemotionalandcognitivefactorsassumedtoactindependently(Donovanetal.,1994).Signi cantly,recentstudiesinthistradition(Dawsonetal.,1990;ErogluandMachleit,1990;McGoldrickandPieros,1998;Shermanetal.,1997)havebeguntoaddresstwooftheaforementionedlimitations,namely,thein uenceofpersonalandsituationalmoderatorsonemotionswithinastoreenvironment(seealsothespecialissueoftheJournalofBusinessResearcheditedbyChebatandRobicheaux,(2003).
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] BOLD Coherence Reveals Segregated Functional Neural Interactions When Adapting to Distinct Torque Perturbations E. Tunik, P. J...
Interactions between the environment and open refrigerated display cabinets in retail food store_环境科学/食品科学_工程科技_专业资料。Interactions between the ...
The e-SCOR modeling and simulation environment is...presented by adapting to business on the Internet...2 3 4 Object interactions (as defined by HLA)...
热门文档